質的研究のCERQual論文が発表されました。
br>
Using Qualitative Evidence in Decision Making for Health and Social Interventions: An Approach to Assess Confidence in Findings from Qualitative Evidence Syntheses (GRADE-CERQual)
Lewin S, Glenton C, Munthe-Kaas H, Carlsen B, Colvin CJ, et al. (2015) Using Qualitative Evidence in Decision Making for Health and Social Interventions: An Approach to Assess Confidence in Findings from Qualitative Evidence Syntheses (GRADE-CERQual).
PLoS Med 12(10): e1001895. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001895
br>
●Table1. Components of the CERQual approach
まあこの辺はGRADEとの比較で対応できます。
limitations=limitations, coherence=consistency, relevance=directness, adequacy of data=precision
●Table 3.The CERQual approach—Definitions of levels of confidence in a review finding
まあこの辺も理解できます。
確信性の程度=high, moderate, low, very low。
●Table 2にはCERQual評価の例(以下)が記載されています。
coherenceやadequacyなどの評価がどうも理解できません。
CERQual is a work in progressとあります。