内科医のエビデンスに基づく医療情報

2015年10月23日 Posted by aihara

Temple Universityの「メタアナリシスとシステマティックレビューのガイド」

Temple Universityの「メタアナリシスとシステマティックレビューのガイド」（Russell Conwell Guide Series）には、さまざまな資料が紹介されています。

3. Question/topic refinement

Formulate a clearly defined answerable question or series of questions, identifying the Population, Intervention,
comparison condition, and Outcome(s) of interest
Example: “Do psychological treatments for PTSD improve PTSD symptomatology in adults, compared with control conditions (e.g., usual care or waiting list) or alternate psychological treatment?”
If there are multiple, related questions, reviewers often develop an analytic framework, which visually shows the logical pathways underlying your questions. Sometimes reviewers need a higher level diagram and multiple logical pathways that show more detail contained in each high level box. An example of a higher level diagram can be found on page 84 of this report. To see an example of a simple analytic framework with four related questions, click here.